RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8446, RFC 9846.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 6066 — Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions; RFC 9846 — The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies Version 1.2 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The TLS protocol provides communications security over the Internet. The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5246
- Published
- August 2008
- Authors
- T. Dierks; E. Rescorla
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 104
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 4492
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 15 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2246 (1999)
- RFC 3268 (2002)
- RFC 3546 (2003)
- RFC 4346 (2006)
- RFC 4366 (2006)
- RFC 4492 (2006)
- RFC 4507 (2006)
- RFC 5077 (2008)
- RFC 5246 (2008)
- RFC 6066 (2011)
- RFC 6961 (2013)
- RFC 7627 (2015)
- RFC 8422 (2018)
- RFC 8446 (2018)
- RFC 9846 (2026) ✓
Read the full history of The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 →
Referenced by
15 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
- RFC 5746Transport Layer Security (TLS) Renegotiation Indication ExtensionCurrent
February 2010
- RFC 5878Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authorization ExtensionsUpdated
May 2010
- RFC 6176Prohibiting Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) Version 2.0Updated
March 2011
- RFC 7465Prohibiting RC4 Cipher SuitesUpdated
February 2015
- RFC 7507TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade AttacksObsoleted
April 2015
- RFC 7568Deprecating Secure Sockets Layer Version 3.0Updated
June 2015
- RFC 7627Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Hash and Extended Master Secret ExtensionObsoleted
September 2015
- RFC 7685A Transport Layer Security (TLS) ClientHello Padding ExtensionCurrent
October 2015
- RFC 7905ChaCha20-Poly1305 Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)Updated
June 2016
- RFC 7919Negotiated Finite Field Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Parameters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)Current
August 2016
- RFC 8446The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3Obsoleted
August 2018
- RFC 8447IANA Registry Updates for TLS and DTLSUpdated
August 2018
- RFC 9155Deprecating MD5 and SHA-1 Signature Hashes in TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2Current
December 2021
- RFC 9846The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3Current
July 2026
- RFC 10015Deprecating Obsolete Key Exchange Methods in TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2Current
July 2026
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6071IP Security (IPsec) and Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Document RoadmapCurrent
February 2011
- RFC 3546Transport Layer Security (TLS) ExtensionsObsoleted
June 2003
- RFC 2411IP Security Document RoadmapObsoleted
November 1998
- RFC 2246The TLS Protocol Version 1.0Obsoleted
January 1999
- RFC 5403RPCSEC_GSS Version 2Updated
February 2009
- RFC 7844Anonymity Profiles for DHCP ClientsCurrent
May 2016
- RFC 7861Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Security Version 3Current
November 2016
- RFC 5209Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and RequirementsCurrent
June 2008
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?