metasystema.org
UpdatedPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 6066: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions

Still current, but amended. Parts of this document are changed or extended by RFC 8446, RFC 8449, RFC 9325, RFC 9846. Read both.

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document provides specifications for existing TLS extensions. It is a companion document for RFC 5246, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2". The extensions specified are server_name, max_fragment_length, client_certificate_url, trusted_ca_keys, truncated_hmac, and status_request. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Document record

Document ID
RFC6066
Published
January 2011
Authors
D. Eastlake 3rd
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
sec
Pages
25
Also known as
—
Obsoletes:
RFC 4366
Updated by:
RFC 8446, RFC 8449, RFC 9325, RFC 9846

Topics

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 15 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 2246 (1999)
  2. RFC 3268 (2002)
  3. RFC 3546 (2003)
  4. RFC 4346 (2006)
  5. RFC 4366 (2006)
  6. RFC 4492 (2006)
  7. RFC 4507 (2006)
  8. RFC 5077 (2008)
  9. RFC 5246 (2008)
  10. RFC 6066 (2011)
  11. RFC 6961 (2013)
  12. RFC 7627 (2015)
  13. RFC 8422 (2018)
  14. RFC 8446 (2018)
  15. RFC 9846 (2026) ✓

Read the full history of The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 →

Referenced by

4 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/6066-transport-layer-security-tls-extensions-extension-definitions