RFC 5077: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Session Resumption without Server-Side State
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8446, RFC 9846.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 6066 — Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions; RFC 9846 — The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a mechanism that enables the Transport Layer Security (TLS) server to resume sessions and avoid keeping per-client session state. The TLS server encapsulates the session state into a ticket and forwards it to the client. The client can subsequently resume a session using the obtained ticket. This document obsoletes RFC 4507. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5077
- Published
- January 2008
- Authors
- J. Salowey; H. Zhou; P. Eronen; H. Tschofenig
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- —
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 15 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2246 (1999)
- RFC 3268 (2002)
- RFC 3546 (2003)
- RFC 4346 (2006)
- RFC 4366 (2006)
- RFC 4492 (2006)
- RFC 4507 (2006)
- RFC 5077 (2008)
- RFC 5246 (2008)
- RFC 6066 (2011)
- RFC 6961 (2013)
- RFC 7627 (2015)
- RFC 8422 (2018)
- RFC 8446 (2018)
- RFC 9846 (2026) ✓
Read the full history of The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 →
Referenced by
3 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?