RFC 7844: Anonymity Profiles for DHCP Clients
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Some DHCP options carry unique identifiers. These identifiers can enable device tracking even if the device administrator takes care of randomizing other potential identifications like link-layer addresses or IPv6 addresses. The anonymity profiles are designed for clients that wish to remain anonymous to the visited network. The profiles provide guidelines on the composition of DHCP or DHCPv6 messages, designed to minimize disclosure of identifying information.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7844
- Published
- May 2016
- Authors
- C. Huitema; T. Mrugalski; S. Krishnan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 26
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7839Access-Network-Identifier Option in DHCPCurrent
June 2016
- RFC 7969Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network TopologyCurrent
October 2016
- RFC 7653DHCPv6 Active LeasequeryCurrent
October 2015
- RFC 8415Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)Obsoleted
November 2018
- RFC 8981Temporary Address Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6Current
February 2021
- RFC 9915Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)Current
January 2026
- RFC 4941Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6Obsoleted
September 2007
- RFC 2131Dynamic Host Configuration ProtocolUpdated
March 1997
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?