RFC 9626: Video Frame Marking RTP Header Extension
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a Video Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes. It is most useful when media is encrypted and essential when the middlebox or node has no access to the media decryption keys. It is also useful for codec-agnostic processing of encrypted or unencrypted media, while it also supports extensions for codec-specific information.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9626
- Published
- March 2025
- Authors
- M. Zanaty; E. Berger; S. Nandakumar
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9628RTP Payload Format for VP9 VideoCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 7798RTP Payload Format for High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)Current
March 2016
- RFC 6185RTP Payload Format for H.264 Reduced-Complexity Decoding Operation (RCDO) VideoCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 9623Implementing Interfaces to Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9622An Abstract Application Programming Interface (API) for Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9621Architecture and Requirements for Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9607RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) CodecCurrent
July 2024
- RFC 9648YANG Data Model for TCPCurrent
October 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?