RFC 9621: Architecture and Requirements for Transport Services
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes an architecture that exposes transport protocol features to applications for network communication. The Transport Services Application Programming Interface (API) is based on an asynchronous, event-driven interaction pattern. This API uses Messages for representing data transfer to applications and describes how a Transport Services Implementation can use multiple IP addresses, multiple protocols, and multiple paths and can provide multiple application streams. This document provides the architecture and requirements. It defines common terminology and concepts to be used in definitions of a Transport Services API and a Transport Services Implementation.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9621
- Published
- January 2025
- Authors
- T. Pauly; B. Trammell; A. Brunstrom; G. Fairhurst; C. S. Perkins
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 29
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9622An Abstract Application Programming Interface (API) for Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9623Implementing Interfaces to Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9626Video Frame Marking RTP Header ExtensionCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9628RTP Payload Format for VP9 VideoCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9607RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) CodecCurrent
July 2024
- RFC 9601Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a ShimCurrent
August 2024
- RFC 9599Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IPCurrent
August 2024
- RFC 9595YANG Schema Item iDentifier (YANG SID)Current
July 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?