RFC 9622: An Abstract Application Programming Interface (API) for Transport Services
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes an abstract Application Programming Interface (API) to the transport layer that enables the selection of transport protocols and network paths dynamically at runtime. This API enables faster deployment of new protocols and protocol features without requiring changes to the applications. The specified API follows the Transport Services Architecture by providing asynchronous, atomic transmission of Messages. It is intended to replace the BSD Socket API as the common interface to the transport layer, in an environment where endpoints could select from multiple network paths and potential transport protocols.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9622
- Published
- January 2025
- Authors
- B. Trammell; M. Welzl; R. Enghardt; G. Fairhurst; M. Kühlewind; C. S. Perkins; P.S. Tiesel; T. Pauly
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 84
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7984Locating Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers in a Dual-Stack IP NetworkCurrent
September 2016
- RFC 9621Architecture and Requirements for Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9623Implementing Interfaces to Transport ServicesCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9626Video Frame Marking RTP Header ExtensionCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9628RTP Payload Format for VP9 VideoCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9607RTP Payload Format for the Secure Communication Interoperability Protocol (SCIP) CodecCurrent
July 2024
- RFC 9601Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a ShimCurrent
August 2024
- RFC 9599Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that Encapsulate IPCurrent
August 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?