RFC 7785: Recommendations for Prefix Binding in the Context of Softwire Dual-Stack Lite
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses issues induced by the change of the Dual- Stack Lite (DS-Lite) Basic Bridging BroadBand (B4) IPv6 address and sketches a set of recommendations to solve those issues.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7785
- Published
- February 2016
- Authors
- S. Vinapamula; M. Boucadair
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8513A YANG Data Model for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)Current
January 2019
- RFC 6431Huawei Port Range Configuration Options for PPP IP Control Protocol (IPCP)Current
November 2011
- RFC 8676YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port (A+P) SoftwiresCurrent
November 2019
- RFC 7393Using the Port Control Protocol (PCP) to Update Dynamic DNSCurrent
November 2014
- RFC 7844Anonymity Profiles for DHCP ClientsCurrent
May 2016
- RFC 7857Updates to Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral RequirementsCurrent
April 2016
- RFC 7678Attribute-Value Pairs for Provisioning Customer Equipment Supporting IPv4-Over-IPv6 Transitional SolutionsCurrent
October 2015
- RFC 7596Lightweight 4over6: An Extension to the Dual-Stack Lite ArchitectureCurrent
July 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?