RFC 7393: Using the Port Control Protocol (PCP) to Update Dynamic DNS
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document focuses on the problems encountered when using dynamic DNS in address-sharing contexts (e.g., Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite) and Network Address and Protocol Translation from IPv6 Clients to IPv4 Servers (NAT64)) during IPv6 transition. Both issues and possible solutions are documented in this memo.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7393
- Published
- November 2014
- Authors
- X. Deng; M. Boucadair; Q. Zhao; J. Huang; C. Zhou
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7857Updates to Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral RequirementsCurrent
April 2016
- RFC 7021Assessing the Impact of Carrier-Grade NAT on Network ApplicationsCurrent
September 2013
- RFC 7785Recommendations for Prefix Binding in the Context of Softwire Dual-Stack LiteCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 7596Lightweight 4over6: An Extension to the Dual-Stack Lite ArchitectureCurrent
July 2015
- RFC 7648Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy FunctionCurrent
September 2015
- RFC 8045RADIUS Extensions for IP Port Configuration and ReportingCurrent
January 2017
- RFC 8114Delivery of IPv4 Multicast Services to IPv4 Clients over an IPv6 Multicast NetworkCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 8513A YANG Data Model for Dual-Stack Lite (DS-Lite)Current
January 2019
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?