RFC 7775: IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In existing specifications, the route preferences for IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability TLVs are not explicitly stated. There are also inconsistencies in the definition of how the up/down bit applies to route preference when the prefix advertisement appears in Level 2 Link State Protocol Data Units (LSPs). This document addresses these issues.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7775
- Published
- February 2016
- Authors
- L. Ginsberg; S. Litkowski; S. Previdi
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 5308
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7774Multicast Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (MPL) Parameter Configuration Option for DHCPv6Current
March 2016
- RFC 7777Advertising Node Administrative Tags in OSPFCurrent
March 2016
- RFC 7771Switching Provider Edge (S-PE) Protection for MPLS and MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Static Multi-Segment PseudowiresCurrent
January 2016
- RFC 7779Directional Airtime Metric Based on Packet Sequence Numbers for Optimized Link State Routing Version 2 (OLSRv2)Current
April 2016
- RFC 7770Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router CapabilitiesCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 7780Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Clarifications, Corrections, and UpdatesUpdated
February 2016
- RFC 7769Media Access Control (MAC) Address Withdrawal over Static PseudowireCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 7781Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Pseudo-Nickname for Active-Active AccessCurrent
February 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?