RFC 7769: Media Access Control (MAC) Address Withdrawal over Static Pseudowire
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies a mechanism to signal Media Access Control (MAC) address withdrawal notification using a pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel (ACH). Such notification is useful when statically provisioned PWs are deployed in a Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) or Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS) environment.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7769
- Published
- February 2016
- Authors
- S. Sivabalan; S. Boutros; H. Shah; S. Aldrin; M. Venkatesan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7026Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header of the MPLS Generic Associated ChannelCurrent
September 2013
- RFC 8104Pseudowire (PW) Endpoint Fast Failure ProtectionCurrent
March 2017
- RFC 7309Redundancy Mechanism for Inter-domain VPLS ServiceCurrent
July 2014
- RFC 7267Dynamic Placement of Multi-Segment PseudowiresCurrent
June 2014
- RFC 8469Recommendation to Use the Ethernet Control WordCurrent
November 2018
- RFC 5641Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Version 3 (L2TPv3) Extended Circuit Status ValuesCurrent
August 2009
- RFC 5586MPLS Generic Associated ChannelUpdated
June 2009
- RFC 5085Pseudowire Virtual Circuit Connectivity Verification (VCCV): A Control Channel for PseudowiresUpdated
December 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?