CurrentINFORMATIONALIETF stream

RFC 6247: Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document reclassifies several TCP extensions that have never seen widespread use to Historic status. The affected RFCs are RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Document record

Document ID
RFC6247
Published
May 2011
Authors
L. Eggert
Status
INFORMATIONAL
Stream
IETF
Area
wit
Pages
4
Also known as
Updates:
RFC 4614

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 13 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 1072 (1988)
  2. RFC 1106 (1989)
  3. RFC 1110 (1989)
  4. RFC 1145 (1990)
  5. RFC 1146 (1990)
  6. RFC 1185 (1990)
  7. RFC 1323 (1992)
  8. RFC 1379 (1992)
  9. RFC 1644 (1994)
  10. RFC 1693 (1994)
  11. RFC 2018 (1996)
  12. RFC 6247 (2011)
  13. RFC 7323 (2014)

Read the full history of TCP Extensions for High Performance

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/6247-moving-the-undeployed-tcp-extensions-rfc-1072-rfc-1106-rfc-1110-rfc-1145-rfc-114