RFC 6354: Forward-Shifted RTP Redundancy Payload Support
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines a simple enhancement to support RTP sessions with forward-shifted redundant encodings, i.e., redundant data sent before the corresponding primary data. Forward-shifted redundancy can be used to conceal losses of a large number of consecutive media frames (e.g., consecutive loss of seconds or even tens of seconds of media). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6354
- Published
- August 2011
- Authors
- Q. Xie
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6335Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number RegistryCurrent
August 2011
- RFC 6401RSVP Extensions for Admission PriorityCurrent
October 2011
- RFC 6298Computing TCP's Retransmission TimerCurrent
June 2011
- RFC 6411Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP SecurityCurrent
October 2011
- RFC 6284Port Mapping between Unicast and Multicast RTP SessionsCurrent
June 2011
- RFC 6429TCP Sender Clarification for Persist ConditionObsoleted
December 2011
- RFC 6266Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)Current
June 2011
- RFC 6263Application Mechanism for Keeping Alive the NAT Mappings Associated with RTP / RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) FlowsCurrent
June 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?