RFC 6266: Use of the Content-Disposition Header Field in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 2616 defines the Content-Disposition response header field, but points out that it is not part of the HTTP/1.1 Standard. This specification takes over the definition and registration of Content-Disposition, as used in HTTP, and clarifies internationalization aspects. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6266
- Published
- June 2011
- Authors
- J. Reschke
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 2616
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2183Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header FieldUpdated
August 1997
- RFC 8607Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV): Managed AttachmentsCurrent
June 2019
- RFC 6263Application Mechanism for Keeping Alive the NAT Mappings Associated with RTP / RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) FlowsCurrent
June 2011
- RFC 6284Port Mapping between Unicast and Multicast RTP SessionsCurrent
June 2011
- RFC 6247Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic StatusCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6298Computing TCP's Retransmission TimerCurrent
June 2011
- RFC 6335Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number RegistryCurrent
August 2011
- RFC 6191Reducing the TIME-WAIT State Using TCP TimestampsCurrent
April 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?