RFC 4495: A Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) Extension for the Reduction of Bandwidth of a Reservation Flow
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document proposes an extension to the Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVPv1) to reduce the guaranteed bandwidth allocated to an existing reservation. This mechanism can be used to affect individual reservations, aggregate reservations, or other forms of RSVP tunnels. This specification is an extension of RFC 2205. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4495
- Published
- May 2006
- Authors
- J. Polk; S. Dhesikan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 21
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 2205
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4506XDR: External Data Representation StandardCurrent
May 2006
- RFC 4460Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Specification Errata and IssuesObsoleted
April 2006
- RFC 4542Implementing an Emergency Telecommunications Service (ETS) for Real-Time Services in the Internet Protocol SuiteUpdated
May 2006
- RFC 4594Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service ClassesUpdated
August 2006
- RFC 4614A Roadmap for Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) Specification DocumentsObsoleted
September 2006
- RFC 4653Improving the Robustness of TCP to Non-Congestion EventsCurrent
August 2006
- RFC 4774Specifying Alternate Semantics for the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) FieldUpdated
November 2006
- RFC 4782Quick-Start for TCP and IPCurrent
January 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?