RFC 4782: Quick-Start for TCP and IP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies an optional Quick-Start mechanism for transport protocols, in cooperation with routers, to determine an allowed sending rate at the start and, at times, in the middle of a data transfer (e.g., after an idle period). While Quick-Start is designed to be used by a range of transport protocols, in this document we only specify its use with TCP. Quick-Start is designed to allow connections to use higher sending rates when there is significant unused bandwidth along the path, and the sender and all of the routers along the path approve the Quick-Start Request. This document describes many paths where Quick-Start Requests would not be approved. These paths include all paths containing routers, IP tunnels, MPLS paths, and the like that do not support Quick- Start. These paths also include paths with routers or middleboxes that drop packets containing IP options. Quick-Start Requests could be difficult to approve over paths that include multi-access layer- two networks. This document also describes environments where the Quick-Start process could fail with false positives, with the sender incorrectly assuming that the Quick-Start Request had been approved by all of the routers along the path. As a result of these concerns, and as a result of the difficulties and seeming absence of motivation for routers, such as core routers to deploy Quick-Start, Quick-Start is being proposed as a mechanism that could be of use in controlled environments, and not as a mechanism that would be intended or appropriate for ubiquitous deployment in the global Internet. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4782
- Published
- January 2007
- Authors
- S. Floyd; M. Allman; A. Jain; P. Sarolahti
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 82
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4774Specifying Alternate Semantics for the Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) FieldUpdated
November 2006
- RFC 4804Aggregation of Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) Reservations over MPLS TE/DS-TE TunnelsCurrent
February 2007
- RFC 4820Padding Chunk and Parameter for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)Current
March 2007
- RFC 4860Generic Aggregate Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) ReservationsCurrent
May 2007
- RFC 4895Authenticated Chunks for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)Current
August 2007
- RFC 4898TCP Extended Statistics MIBCurrent
May 2007
- RFC 4653Improving the Robustness of TCP to Non-Congestion EventsCurrent
August 2006
- RFC 4923Quality of Service (QoS) Signaling in a Nested Virtual Private NetworkCurrent
August 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?