RFC 4460: Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Specification Errata and Issues
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9260.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 9260 — Stream Control Transmission Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document is a compilation of issues found during six interoperability events and 5 years of experience with implementing, testing, and using SCTP along with the suggested fixes. This document provides deltas to RFC 2960 and is organized in a time-based way. The issues are listed in the order they were brought up. Because some text is changed several times, the last delta in the text is the one that should be applied. In addition to the delta, a description of the problem and the details of the solution are also provided. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4460
- Published
- April 2006
- Authors
- R. Stewart; I. Arias-Rodriguez; K. Poon; A. Caro; M. Tuexen
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 109
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 9260
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 8 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2960 (2000)
- RFC 3309 (2002)
- RFC 4460 (2006)
- RFC 4960 (2007)
- RFC 6096 (2011)
- RFC 7053 (2013)
- RFC 8540 (2019)
- RFC 9260 (2022) ✓
Read the full history of Stream Control Transmission Protocol →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4960Stream Control Transmission ProtocolObsoleted
September 2007
- RFC 2960Stream Control Transmission ProtocolObsoleted
October 2000
- RFC 3768Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)Obsoleted
April 2004
- RFC 3027Protocol Complications with the IP Network Address TranslatorCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 2338Virtual Router Redundancy ProtocolObsoleted
April 1998
- RFC 2698A Two Rate Three Color MarkerCurrent
September 1999
- RFC 2697A Single Rate Three Color MarkerCurrent
September 1999
- RFC 8899Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery for Datagram TransportsCurrent
September 2020
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?