RFC 2547: BGP/MPLS VPNs
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 4364.
Current version: RFC 4364 — BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a method by which a Service Provider with an IP backbone may provide VPNs (Virtual Private Networks) for its customers. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2547
- Published
- March 1999
- Authors
- E. Rosen; Y. Rekhter
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 25
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 4364
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2430A Provider Architecture for Differentiated Services and Traffic Engineering (PASTE)Current
October 1998
- RFC 2042Registering New BGP Attribute TypesCurrent
January 1997
- RFC 3167Request to Move RFC 1745 to Historic StatusCurrent
August 2001
- RFC 2519A Framework for Inter-Domain Route AggregationCurrent
February 1999
- RFC 2702Requirements for Traffic Engineering Over MPLSCurrent
September 1999
- RFC 2283Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4Obsoleted
February 1998
- RFC 2270Using a Dedicated AS for Sites Homed to a Single ProviderCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2842Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4Obsoleted
May 2000
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?