RFC 2270: Using a Dedicated AS for Sites Homed to a Single Provider
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
With the increased growth of the Internet, the number of customers using BGP4 has grown significantly. RFC1930 outlines a set of guidelines for when one needs and should use an AS. However, the customer and service provider (ISP) are left with a problem as a result of this in that while there is no need for an allocated AS under the guidelines, certain conditions make the use of BGP4 a very pragmatic and perhaps only way to connect a customer homed to a single ISP. This paper proposes a solution to this problem in line with recommendations set forth in RFC1930. This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2270
- Published
- January 1998
- Authors
- J. Stewart; T. Bates; R. Chandra; E. Chen
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 6
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1966BGP Route Reflection An alternative to full mesh IBGPObsoleted
June 1996
- RFC 4456BGP Route Reflection: An Alternative to Full Mesh Internal BGP (IBGP)Updated
April 2006
- RFC 2519A Framework for Inter-Domain Route AggregationCurrent
February 1999
- RFC 1745BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF InteractionCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1364BGP OSPF InteractionObsoleted
September 1992
- RFC 3178IPv6 Multihoming Support at Site Exit RoutersCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 2267Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address SpoofingObsoleted
January 1998
- RFC 2283Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4Obsoleted
February 1998
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?