RFC 2842: Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 3392.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 5492 — Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines new Optional Parameter, called Capabilities, that is expected to facilitate introduction of new capabilities in BGP by providing graceful capability advertisement without requiring that BGP peering be terminated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2842
- Published
- May 2000
- Authors
- R. Chandra; J. Scudder
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 5
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 3392
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2842 (2000)
- RFC 3392 (2002)
- RFC 5492 (2009) ✓
Read the full history of Capabilities Advertisement with BGP-4 →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2858Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4Obsoleted
June 2000
- RFC 2519A Framework for Inter-Domain Route AggregationCurrent
February 1999
- RFC 2283Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4Obsoleted
February 1998
- RFC 2270Using a Dedicated AS for Sites Homed to a Single ProviderCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 1998An Application of the BGP Community Attribute in Multi-home RoutingCurrent
August 1996
- RFC 1997BGP Communities AttributeUpdated
August 1996
- RFC 1966BGP Route Reflection An alternative to full mesh IBGPObsoleted
June 1996
- RFC 1965Autonomous System Confederations for BGPObsoleted
June 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?