RFC 1705: Six Virtual Inches to the Left: The Problem with IPng
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document was submitted to the IETF IPng area in response to RFC 1550. This RFC suggests that a new version of TCP (TCPng), and UDP, be developed and deployed. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1705
- Published
- October 1994
- Authors
- R. Carlson; D. Ficarella
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 27
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1752The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation ProtocolCurrent
January 1995
- RFC 1707CATNIP: Common Architecture for the InternetCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 1715The H Ratio for Address Assignment EfficiencyUpdated
November 1994
- RFC 1719A Direction for IPngCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1726Technical Criteria for Choosing IP The Next Generation (IPng)Current
December 1994
- RFC 1753IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and Addressing ArchitectureCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1955New Scheme for Internet Routing and Addressing (ENCAPS) for IPNGCurrent
June 1996
- RFC 1454Comparison of Proposals for Next Version of IPCurrent
May 1993
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?