RFC 1454: Comparison of Proposals for Next Version of IP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This is a slightly edited reprint of RARE Technical Report (RTC(93)004). This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1454
- Published
- May 1993
- Authors
- T. Dixon
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1752The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation ProtocolCurrent
January 1995
- RFC 1705Six Virtual Inches to the Left: The Problem with IPngCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 1707CATNIP: Common Architecture for the InternetCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 1715The H Ratio for Address Assignment EfficiencyUpdated
November 1994
- RFC 1719A Direction for IPngCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1726Technical Criteria for Choosing IP The Next Generation (IPng)Current
December 1994
- RFC 1753IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and Addressing ArchitectureCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1955New Scheme for Internet Routing and Addressing (ENCAPS) for IPNGCurrent
June 1996
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?