RFC 1752: The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document presents the recommendation of the IPng Area Directors on what should be used to replace the current version of the Internet Protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1752
- Published
- January 1995
- Authors
- S. Bradner; A. Mankin
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 52
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1753IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and Addressing ArchitectureCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1726Technical Criteria for Choosing IP The Next Generation (IPng)Current
December 1994
- RFC 1719A Direction for IPngCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1885Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)Obsoleted
December 1995
- RFC 2460Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationObsoleted
December 1998
- RFC 8200Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) SpecificationUpdated
July 2017
- RFC 1754IP over ATM Working Group's Recommendations for the ATM Forum's Multiprotocol BOF Version 1Current
January 1995
- RFC 1744Observations on the Management of the Internet Address SpaceCurrent
December 1994
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?