RFC 1645: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 2
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 1861.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 1861 — Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 -Two-Way Enhanced
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This RFC suggests a simple way for delivering both alphanumeric and numeric pages (one-way) to radio paging terminals. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1645
- Published
- July 1994
- Authors
- A. Gwinn
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1568 (1994)
- RFC 1645 (1994)
- RFC 1861 (1995) ✓
Read the full history of Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 -Two-Way Enhanced →
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1641Using Unicode with MIMECurrent
July 1994
- RFC 1651SMTP Service ExtensionsObsoleted
July 1994
- RFC 1652SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransportObsoleted
July 1994
- RFC 1685Writing X.400 O/R NamesCurrent
August 1994
- RFC 1711Classifications in E-mail RoutingCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 1569Principles of Operation for the TPC.INT Subdomain: Radio Paging -- Technical ProceduresObsoleted
January 1994
- RFC 1725Post Office Protocol - Version 3Obsoleted
November 1994
- RFC 1563The text/enriched MIME Content-typeObsoleted
January 1994
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?