RFC 1725: Post Office Protocol - Version 3
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 1939.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 1939 — Post Office Protocol - Version 3
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo is a revision to RFC 1460, a Draft Standard. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1725
- Published
- November 1994
- Authors
- J. Myers; M. Rose
- Status
- INTERNET STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 18
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 5 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1711Classifications in E-mail RoutingCurrent
October 1994
- RFC 2635DON'T SPEW A Set of Guidelines for Mass Unsolicited Mailings and Postings (spam*)Current
June 1999
- RFC 5721POP3 Support for UTF-8Obsoleted
February 2010
- RFC 1685Writing X.400 O/R NamesCurrent
August 1994
- RFC 1806Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition HeaderObsoleted
June 1995
- RFC 1842ASCII Printable Characters-Based Chinese Character Encoding for Internet MessagesCurrent
August 1995
- RFC 1843HZ - A Data Format for Exchanging Files of Arbitrarily Mixed Chinese and ASCII charactersCurrent
August 1995
- RFC 1563The text/enriched MIME Content-typeObsoleted
January 1994
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?