RFC 1861: Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 -Two-Way Enhanced
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This RFC suggests a simple way for delivering wireless messages, both one and two-way, to appropriate receiving devices. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC1861
- Published
- October 1995
- Authors
- A. Gwinn
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 23
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoletes:
- RFC 1645
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1568 (1994)
- RFC 1645 (1994)
- RFC 1861 (1995)
Read the full history of Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 -Two-Way Enhanced →
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2188AT&T/Neda's Efficient Short Remote Operations (ESRO) Protocol Specification Version 1.2Current
September 1997
- RFC 2524Neda's Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery (EMSD) Protocol Specification Version 1.3Current
February 1999
- RFC 2757Long Thin NetworksCurrent
January 2000
- RFC 2501Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation ConsiderationsCurrent
January 1999
- RFC 3154Requirements and Functional Architecture for an IP Host Alerting ProtocolCurrent
August 2001
- RFC 3322Signaling Compression (SigComp) Requirements & AssumptionsCurrent
January 2003
- RFC 3910The SPIRITS (Services in PSTN requesting Internet Services) ProtocolCurrent
October 2004
- RFC 4416Goals for Internet Messaging to Support Diverse Service EnvironmentsCurrent
February 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?