RFC 9980: Post-Quantum Cryptography in OpenPGP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines a post-quantum public key algorithm extension for the OpenPGP protocol, extending RFC 9580. Given the generally assumed threat of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer, this extension provides a basis for long-term secure OpenPGP signatures and ciphertexts. Specifically, it defines composite public key encryption based on ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber), composite public key signatures based on ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium), both in combination with Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), and SLH-DSA (formerly SPHINCS+) as a standalone public key signature scheme.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9980
- Published
- June 2026
- Authors
- S. Kousidis; J. Roth; F. Strenzke; A. Wussler
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 222
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9763Related Certificates for Use in Multiple Authentications within a ProtocolCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9580OpenPGPCurrent
July 2024
- RFC 9370Multiple Key Exchanges in the Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)Current
May 2023
- RFC 8812CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) and JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) Registrations for Web Authentication (WebAuthn) AlgorithmsCurrent
August 2020
- RFC 4491Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL ProfileCurrent
May 2006
- RFC 2440OpenPGP Message FormatObsoleted
November 1998
- RFC 8230Using RSA Algorithms with CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) MessagesCurrent
September 2017
- RFC 5581The Camellia Cipher in OpenPGPObsoleted
June 2009
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?