RFC 4491: Using the GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 Algorithms with the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL Profile
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document supplements RFC 3279. It describes encoding formats, identifiers, and parameter formats for the algorithms GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 for use in Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4491
- Published
- May 2006
- Authors
- S. Leontiev; D. Shefanovski
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 3279
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4490Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94, and GOST R 34.10-2001 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
May 2006
- RFC 4357Additional Cryptographic Algorithms for Use with GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.10-94, GOST R 34.10-2001, and GOST R 34.11-94 AlgorithmsCurrent
January 2006
- RFC 4211Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)Updated
September 2005
- RFC 3850Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Certificate HandlingObsoleted
July 2004
- RFC 3647Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy and Certification Practices FrameworkCurrent
November 2003
- RFC 5750Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.2 Certificate HandlingObsoleted
January 2010
- RFC 2560X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSPObsoleted
June 1999
- RFC 2527Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Policy and Certification Practices FrameworkObsoleted
March 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?