RFC 9761: Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) for TLS and DTLS Profiles for Internet of Things (IoT) Devices
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo extends the Manufacturer Usage Description (MUD) specification to allow manufacturers to define TLS and DTLS profile parameters. This allows a network security service to identify unexpected (D)TLS usage, which can indicate the presence of unauthorized software, malware, or security policy-violating traffic on an endpoint.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9761
- Published
- April 2025
- Authors
- T. Reddy.K; D. Wing; B. Anderson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 33
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9742A YANG Data Model for Syslog ManagementCurrent
April 2025
- RFC 9740New IPFIX Information Elements for TCP Options and IPv6 Extension HeadersCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9736The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Peer Up Message NamespaceCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9733BRSKI with Alternative Enrollment (BRSKI-AE)Current
March 2025
- RFC 9726Operational Considerations for Use of DNS in Internet of Things (IoT) DevicesCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9803Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Mapping for DNS Time-to-Live (TTL) ValuesCurrent
June 2025
- RFC 9718DNSSEC Trust Anchor Publication for the Root ZoneCurrent
January 2025
- RFC 9715IP Fragmentation Avoidance in DNS over UDPCurrent
January 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?