RFC 9653: Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) uses a 32-bit checksum in the common header of each packet to provide some level of data integrity. If another method used by SCTP already provides the same or a higher level of data integrity, computing this checksum does not provide any additional protection but does consume computing resources. This document provides a simple extension allowing SCTP to save these computing resources by using zero as the checksum in a backwards-compatible way. It also defines how this feature can be used when SCTP packets are encapsulated in Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packets.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9653
- Published
- September 2024
- Authors
- M. Tüxen; V. Boivie; F. Castelli; R. Jesup
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9652The Link-Template HTTP Header FieldCurrent
September 2024
- RFC 9651Structured Field Values for HTTPCurrent
September 2024
- RFC 9648YANG Data Model for TCPCurrent
October 2024
- RFC 9659Window Sizing for Zstandard Content EncodingCurrent
September 2024
- RFC 9668Using Ephemeral Diffie-Hellman Over COSE (EDHOC) with the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) and Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE)Current
November 2024
- RFC 9677Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Metadata for Delegated CredentialsCurrent
October 2024
- RFC 9628RTP Payload Format for VP9 VideoCurrent
March 2025
- RFC 9626Video Frame Marking RTP Header ExtensionCurrent
March 2025
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?