RFC 9446: Reflections on Ten Years Past the Snowden Revelations
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo contains the thoughts and recountings of events that transpired during and after the release of information about the United States National Security Agency (NSA) by Edward Snowden in 2013. There are four perspectives: that of someone who was involved with sifting through the information to responsibly inform the public, that of a security area director of the IETF, that of a human rights expert, and that of a computer science and affiliate law professor. The purpose of this memo is to provide some historical perspective, while at the same time offering a view as to what security and privacy challenges the technical community should consider. These essays do not represent a consensus view, but that of the individual authors.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9446
- Published
- July 2023
- Authors
- S. Farrell; F. Badii; B. Schneier; S. M. Bellovin
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 29
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7844Anonymity Profiles for DHCP ClientsCurrent
May 2016
- RFC 7943A Method for Generating Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers (IIDs) with the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)Current
September 2016
- RFC 8576Internet of Things (IoT) Security: State of the Art and ChallengesCurrent
April 2019
- RFC 7687Report from the Strengthening the Internet (STRINT) WorkshopCurrent
December 2015
- RFC 7293The Require-Recipient-Valid-Since Header Field and SMTP Service ExtensionCurrent
July 2014
- RFC 5403RPCSEC_GSS Version 2Updated
February 2009
- RFC 1984IAB and IESG Statement on Cryptographic Technology and the InternetCurrent
August 1996
- RFC 1281Guidelines for the Secure Operation of the InternetCurrent
November 1991
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?