RFC 9319: The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document recommends ways to reduce the forged-origin hijack attack surface by prudently limiting the set of IP prefixes that are included in a Route Origin Authorization (ROA). One recommendation is to avoid using the maxLength attribute in ROAs except in some specific cases. The recommendations complement and extend those in RFC 7115. This document also discusses the creation of ROAs for facilitating the use of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) mitigation services. Considerations related to ROAs and RPKI-based Route Origin Validation (RPKI-ROV) in the context of destination-based Remotely Triggered Discard Route (RTDR) (elsewhere referred to as "Remotely Triggered Black Hole") filtering are also highlighted.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9319
- Published
- October 2022
- Authors
- Y. Gilad; S. Goldberg; K. Sriram; J. Snijders; B. Maddison
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- BCP185
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9255The 'I' in RPKI Does Not Stand for IdentityCurrent
June 2022
- RFC 6916Algorithm Agility Procedure for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)Current
April 2013
- RFC 6487A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource CertificatesUpdated
February 2012
- RFC 6483Validation of Route Origination Using the Resource Certificate Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)Current
February 2012
- RFC 6481A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository StructureCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 9317Operational Considerations for Streaming MediaCurrent
October 2022
- RFC 9322In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active FlagsCurrent
November 2022
- RFC 9323A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)Current
November 2022
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?