RFC 6916: Algorithm Agility Procedure for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies the process that Certification Authorities (CAs) and Relying Parties (RPs) participating in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) will need to follow to transition to a new (and probably cryptographically stronger) algorithm set. The process is expected to be completed over a timescale of several years. Consequently, no emergency transition is specified. The transition procedure defined in this document supports only a top-down migration (parent migrates before children).
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6916
- Published
- April 2013
- Authors
- R. Gagliano; S. Kent; S. Turner
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- BCP182
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6907Use Cases and Interpretations of Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Objects for Issuers and Relying PartiesCurrent
March 2013
- RFC 7132Threat Model for BGP Path SecurityCurrent
February 2014
- RFC 6491Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Objects Issued by IANACurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6487A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource CertificatesUpdated
February 2012
- RFC 6483Validation of Route Origination Using the Resource Certificate Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)Current
February 2012
- RFC 6481A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository StructureCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 7730Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor LocatorObsoleted
January 2016
- RFC 6382Unique Origin Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) per Node for Globally Anycasted ServicesCurrent
October 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?