RFC 9100: Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Features and Versions
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This short document updates RFC 8428, "Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)", by specifying the use of independently selectable "SenML Features" and mapping them to SenML version numbers.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC9100
- Published
- August 2021
- Authors
- C. Bormann
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 7
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 8428
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9193Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Fields for Indicating Data Value Content-FormatCurrent
June 2022
- RFC 9430Extension of the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Profile for Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments (ACE) to Transport Layer Security (TLS)Current
July 2023
- RFC 8798Additional Units for Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)Current
June 2020
- RFC 8790FETCH and PATCH with Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML)Current
June 2020
- RFC 8323CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) over TCP, TLS, and WebSocketsUpdated
February 2018
- RFC 7959Block-Wise Transfers in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Updated
August 2016
- RFC 7641Observing Resources in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Updated
September 2015
- RFC 9159IPv6 Mesh over BLUETOOTH(R) Low Energy Using the Internet Protocol Support Profile (IPSP)Current
December 2021
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?