RFC 7641: Observing Resources in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) is a RESTful application protocol for constrained nodes and networks. The state of a resource on a CoAP server can change over time. This document specifies a simple protocol extension for CoAP that enables CoAP clients to "observe" resources, i.e., to retrieve a representation of a resource and keep this representation updated by the server over a period of time. The protocol follows a best-effort approach for sending new representations to clients and provides eventual consistency between the state observed by each client and the actual resource state at the server.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC7641
- Published
- September 2015
- Authors
- K. Hartke
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 30
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 8323
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7959Block-Wise Transfers in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)Updated
August 2016
- RFC 8628OAuth 2.0 Device Authorization GrantCurrent
August 2019
- RFC 9100Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Features and VersionsCurrent
August 2021
- RFC 9193Sensor Measurement Lists (SenML) Fields for Indicating Data Value Content-FormatCurrent
June 2022
- RFC 7744Use Cases for Authentication and Authorization in Constrained EnvironmentsCurrent
January 2016
- RFC 74006LoWPAN-GHC: Generic Header Compression for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs)Current
November 2014
- RFC 7228Terminology for Constrained-Node NetworksCurrent
May 2014
- RFC 8724SCHC: Generic Framework for Static Context Header Compression and FragmentationUpdated
April 2020
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?