RFC 5644: IP Performance Metrics (IPPM): Spatial and Multicast
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The IETF has standardized IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) for measuring end-to-end performance between two points. This memo defines two new categories of metrics that extend the coverage to multiple measurement points. It defines spatial metrics for measuring the performance of segments of a source to destination path, and metrics for measuring the performance between a source and many destinations in multiparty communications (e.g., a multicast tree). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5644
- Published
- October 2009
- Authors
- E. Stephan; L. Liang; A. Morton
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 57
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 6248
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5650Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Line 2 (VDSL2)Current
September 2009
- RFC 5635Remote Triggered Black Hole Filtering with Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF)Current
August 2009
- RFC 5655Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) File FormatCurrent
October 2009
- RFC 5624Quality of Service Parameters for Usage with DiameterCurrent
August 2009
- RFC 5618Mixed Security Mode for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)Current
August 2009
- RFC 5674Alarms in SyslogCurrent
October 2009
- RFC 5675Mapping Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications to SYSLOG MessagesCurrent
October 2009
- RFC 5676Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) NotificationsCurrent
October 2009
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?