RFC 5618: Mixed Security Mode for the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo describes a simple extension to TWAMP (the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol). The extension adds the option to use different security modes in the TWAMP-Control and TWAMP-Test protocols simultaneously. The memo also describes a new IANA registry for additional features, called the TWAMP Modes registry. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5618
- Published
- August 2009
- Authors
- A. Morton; K. Hedayat
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 5357
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5624Quality of Service Parameters for Usage with DiameterCurrent
August 2009
- RFC 5610Exporting Type Information for IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) Information ElementsCurrent
July 2009
- RFC 5635Remote Triggered Black Hole Filtering with Unicast Reverse Path Forwarding (uRPF)Current
August 2009
- RFC 5644IP Performance Metrics (IPPM): Spatial and MulticastUpdated
October 2009
- RFC 5650Definitions of Managed Objects for Very High Speed Digital Subscriber Line 2 (VDSL2)Current
September 2009
- RFC 5655Specification of the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) File FormatCurrent
October 2009
- RFC 5674Alarms in SyslogCurrent
October 2009
- RFC 5675Mapping Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications to SYSLOG MessagesCurrent
October 2009
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?