RFC 5242: A Generalized Unified Character Code: Western European and CJK Sections
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Many issues have been identified with the use of general-purpose character sets for internationalized domain names and similar purposes. This memo describes a fully unified coded character set for scripts based on Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, and Chinese (CJK) characters. It is not a complete specification of that character set. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5242
- Published
- April 2008
- Authors
- J. Klensin; H. Alvestrand
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 9095Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Domain Name Mapping Extension for Strict Bundling RegistrationCurrent
July 2021
- RFC 5890Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document FrameworkCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 5891Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): ProtocolCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 5892The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA)Updated
August 2010
- RFC 5893Right-to-Left Scripts for Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA)Current
August 2010
- RFC 5894Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA): Background, Explanation, and RationaleCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 6452The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) - Unicode 6.0Current
November 2011
- RFC 3491Nameprep: A Stringprep Profile for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN)Obsoleted
March 2003
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?