RFC 6452: The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) - Unicode 6.0
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo documents IETF consensus for Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) derived character properties related to the three code points, existing in Unicode 5.2, that changed property values when version 6.0 was released. The consensus is that no update is needed to RFC 5892 based on the changes made in Unicode 6.0. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6452
- Published
- November 2011
- Authors
- P. Faltstrom; P. Hoffman
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 4
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5892The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA)Updated
August 2010
- RFC 9224Finding the Authoritative Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) ServiceCurrent
March 2022
- RFC 7505A "Null MX" No Service Resource Record for Domains That Accept No MailCurrent
June 2015
- RFC 7940Representing Label Generation Rulesets Using XMLCurrent
August 2016
- RFC 7984Locating Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Servers in a Dual-Stack IP NetworkCurrent
September 2016
- RFC 8484DNS Queries over HTTPS (DoH)Current
October 2018
- RFC 6418Multiple Interfaces and Provisioning Domains Problem StatementCurrent
November 2011
- RFC 6382Unique Origin Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) per Node for Globally Anycasted ServicesCurrent
October 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?