RFC 4215: Analysis on IPv6 Transition in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Networks
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document analyzes the transition to IPv6 in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) packet networks. These networks are based on General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) technology, and the radio network architecture is based on Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) or Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS)/Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) technology. The focus is on analyzing different transition scenarios and applicable transition mechanisms and finding solutions for those transition scenarios. In these scenarios, the User Equipment (UE) connects to other nodes, e.g., in the Internet, and IPv6/IPv4 transition mechanisms are needed. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4215
- Published
- October 2005
- Authors
- J. Wiljakka
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 24
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4187Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA)Updated
January 2006
- RFC 3310Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Digest Authentication Using Authentication and Key Agreement (AKA)Current
September 2002
- RFC 7254A Uniform Resource Name Namespace for the Global System for Mobile Communications Association (GSMA) and the International Mobile station Equipment Identity (IMEI)Current
May 2014
- RFC 7255Using the International Mobile station Equipment Identity (IMEI) Uniform Resource Name (URN) as an Instance IDCurrent
May 2014
- RFC 4192Procedures for Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag DayCurrent
September 2005
- RFC 4177Architectural Approaches to Multi-homing for IPv6Current
September 2005
- RFC 4148IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics RegistryObsoleted
August 2005
- RFC 4116IPv4 Multihoming Practices and LimitationsCurrent
July 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?