RFC 4148: IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Metrics Registry
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 6248.
Current version: RFC 6248 — RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo defines a registry for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM). It assigns and registers an initial set of OBJECT IDENTITIES to currently defined metrics in the IETF. This memo also defines the rules for adding IP Performance Metrics that are defined in the future and for encouraging all IP performance metrics to be registered here. IANA has been assigned to administer this new registry. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4148
- Published
- August 2005
- Authors
- E. Stephan
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- BCP108
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 6248
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4177Architectural Approaches to Multi-homing for IPv6Current
September 2005
- RFC 4116IPv4 Multihoming Practices and LimitationsCurrent
July 2005
- RFC 4192Procedures for Renumbering an IPv6 Network without a Flag DayCurrent
September 2005
- RFC 4215Analysis on IPv6 Transition in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) NetworksCurrent
October 2005
- RFC 4029Scenarios and Analysis for Introducing IPv6 into ISP NetworksCurrent
March 2005
- RFC 4339IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information ApproachesCurrent
February 2006
- RFC 3956Embedding the Rendezvous Point (RP) Address in an IPv6 Multicast AddressUpdated
November 2004
- RFC 3904Evaluation of IPv6 Transition Mechanisms for Unmanaged NetworksCurrent
September 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?