RFC 4143: Facsimile Using Internet Mail (IFAX) Service of ENUM
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the functional specification and definition of the ENUM Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) record for IFax service. IFax is "facsimile using Internet mail". For this use, the Domain Name System (DNS) returns the email address of the referenced IFax system. This mechanism allows email-based fax communication to use telephone numbers instead of requiring the sender to already know the recipient email address. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4143
- Published
- November 2005
- Authors
- K. Toyoda; D. Crocker
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 5
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 6118
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3404Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)Current
October 2002
- RFC 3403Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) DatabaseCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3402Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Two: The AlgorithmCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3401Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDSCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 2915The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource RecordObsoleted
September 2000
- RFC 2247Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished NamesUpdated
January 1998
- RFC 4159Deprecation of "ip6.int"Current
August 2005
- RFC 3915Domain Registry Grace Period Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)Current
October 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?