RFC 2247: Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished Names
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines an algorithm by which a name registered with the Internet Domain Name Service [2] can be represented as an LDAP distinguished name. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2247
- Published
- January 1998
- Authors
- S. Kille; M. Wahl; A. Grimstad; R. Huber; S. Sataluri
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 7
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2649An LDAP Control and Schema for Holding Operation SignaturesCurrent
August 1999
- RFC 2739Calendar Attributes for vCard and LDAPUpdated
January 2000
- RFC 2891LDAP Control Extension for Server Side Sorting of Search ResultsCurrent
August 2000
- RFC 3088OpenLDAP Root Service An experimental LDAP referral serviceCurrent
April 2001
- RFC 3402Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Two: The AlgorithmCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3403Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) DatabaseCurrent
October 2002
- RFC 3404Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI)Current
October 2002
- RFC 3876Returning Matched Values with the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol version 3 (LDAPv3)Current
September 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?