RFC 3502: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - MULTIAPPEND Extension
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the multiappending extension to the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) (RFC 3501). This extension provides substantial performance improvements for IMAP clients which upload multiple messages at a time to a mailbox on the server. A server which supports this extension indicates this with a capability name of "MULTIAPPEND". [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3502
- Published
- March 2003
- Authors
- M. Crispin
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 7
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2060Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4rev1Obsoleted
December 1996
- RFC 3501INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1Obsoleted
March 2003
- RFC 5255Internet Message Access Protocol InternationalizationCurrent
June 2008
- RFC 2595Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAPUpdated
June 1999
- RFC 2062Internet Message Access Protocol - Obsolete SyntaxCurrent
December 1996
- RFC 2061IMAP4 Compatibility with IMAP2bisCurrent
December 1996
- RFC 3656The Mailbox Update (MUPDATE) Distributed Mailbox Database ProtocolUpdated
December 2003
- RFC 3691Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) UNSELECT commandCurrent
February 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?