RFC 2595: Using TLS with IMAP, POP3 and ACAP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Recognizing that such sites will desire simple password authentication in combination with TLS encryption, this specification defines the PLAIN SASL mechanism for use with protocols which lack a simple password authentication command such as ACAP and SMTP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2595
- Published
- June 1999
- Authors
- C. Newman
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
3 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
- RFC 4616The PLAIN Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) MechanismUpdated
August 2006
- RFC 7817Updated Transport Layer Security (TLS) Server Identity Check Procedure for Email-Related ProtocolsCurrent
March 2016
- RFC 8314Cleartext Considered Obsolete: Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) for Email Submission and AccessUpdated
January 2018
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3656The Mailbox Update (MUPDATE) Distributed Mailbox Database ProtocolUpdated
December 2003
- RFC 2487SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLSObsoleted
January 1999
- RFC 2818HTTP Over TLSObsoleted
May 2000
- RFC 2554SMTP Service Extension for AuthenticationObsoleted
March 1999
- RFC 2808The SecurID(r) SASL MechanismCurrent
April 2000
- RFC 2246The TLS Protocol Version 1.0Obsoleted
January 1999
- RFC 2245Anonymous SASL MechanismObsoleted
November 1997
- RFC 2244ACAP -- Application Configuration Access ProtocolUpdated
November 1997
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?