RFC 3137: OSPF Stub Router Advertisement
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 6987.
Current version: RFC 6987 — OSPF Stub Router Advertisement
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo describes a backward-compatible technique that may be used by OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) implementations to advertise unavailability to forward transit traffic or to lower the preference level for the paths through such a router. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3137
- Published
- June 2001
- Authors
- A. Retana; L. Nguyen; R. White; A. Zinin; D. McPherson
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 5
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 6987
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2329OSPF Standardization ReportCurrent
April 1998
- RFC 2178OSPF Version 2Obsoleted
July 1997
- RFC 1850OSPF Version 2 Management Information BaseObsoleted
November 1995
- RFC 1793Extending OSPF to Support Demand CircuitsUpdated
April 1995
- RFC 1745BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF InteractionCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1587The OSPF NSSA OptionObsoleted
March 1994
- RFC 1586Guidelines for Running OSPF Over Frame Relay NetworksCurrent
March 1994
- RFC 1364BGP OSPF InteractionObsoleted
September 1992
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?