RFC 2178: OSPF Version 2
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 2328.
Current document in this lineage: RFC 2328 — OSPF Version 2
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo documents version 2 of the OSPF protocol. OSPF is a link-state routing protocol. It is designed to be run internal to a single Autonomous System. Each OSPF router maintains an identical database describing the Autonomous System's topology. From this database, a routing table is calculated by constructing a shortest-path tree. OSPF recalculates routes quickly in the face of topological changes, utilizing a minimum of routing protocol traffic. OSPF provides support for equal-cost multipath. An area routing capability is provided, enabling an additional level of routing protection and a reduction in routing protocol traffic. In addition, all OSPF routing protocol exchanges are authenticated. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2178
- Published
- July 1997
- Authors
- J. Moy
- Status
- DRAFT STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 211
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 5 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 1364BGP OSPF InteractionObsoleted
September 1992
- RFC 1850OSPF Version 2 Management Information BaseObsoleted
November 1995
- RFC 1745BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF InteractionCurrent
December 1994
- RFC 1587The OSPF NSSA OptionObsoleted
March 1994
- RFC 2329OSPF Standardization ReportCurrent
April 1998
- RFC 1793Extending OSPF to Support Demand CircuitsUpdated
April 1995
- RFC 1586Guidelines for Running OSPF Over Frame Relay NetworksCurrent
March 1994
- RFC 1370Applicability Statement for OSPFCurrent
October 1992
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?