RFC 2966: Domain-wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 5302.
Current version: RFC 5302 — Domain-Wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes extensions to the Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) protocol to support optimal routing within a two-level domain. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2966
- Published
- October 2000
- Authors
- T. Li; T. Przygienda; H. Smit
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 5302
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2763Dynamic Hostname Exchange Mechanism for IS-ISObsoleted
February 2000
- RFC 2519A Framework for Inter-Domain Route AggregationCurrent
February 1999
- RFC 2338Virtual Router Redundancy ProtocolObsoleted
April 1998
- RFC 2270Using a Dedicated AS for Sites Homed to a Single ProviderCurrent
January 1998
- RFC 2236Internet Group Management Protocol, Version 2Updated
November 1997
- RFC 2201Core Based Trees (CBT) Multicast Routing ArchitectureCurrent
September 1997
- RFC 3768Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)Obsoleted
April 2004
- RFC 2103Mobility Support for Nimrod : Challenges and Solution ApproachesCurrent
February 1997
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?