RFC 2920: SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo defines an extension to the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) service whereby a server can indicate the extent of its ability to accept multiple commands in a single Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) send operation. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2920
- Published
- September 2000
- Authors
- N. Freed
- Status
- INTERNET STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- STD60
- Obsoletes:
- RFC 2197
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 1854 (1995)
- RFC 2197 (1997)
- RFC 2920 (2000)
Read the full history of SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining →
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2873TCP Processing of the IPv4 Precedence FieldObsoleted
June 2000
- RFC 2883An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCPCurrent
July 2000
- RFC 2861TCP Congestion Window ValidationObsoleted
June 2000
- RFC 2988Computing TCP's Retransmission TimerObsoleted
November 2000
- RFC 3042Enhancing TCP's Loss Recovery Using Limited TransmitCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 3081Mapping the BEEP Core onto TCPCurrent
March 2001
- RFC 3293General Switch Management Protocol (GSMP) Packet Encapsulations for Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), Ethernet and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)Current
June 2002
- RFC 2507IP Header CompressionCurrent
February 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?