RFC 2861: TCP Congestion Window Validation
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 7661.
Current version: RFC 7661 — Updating TCP to Support Rate-Limited Traffic
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a simple modification to TCP's congestion control algorithms to decay the congestion window cwnd after the transition from a sufficiently-long application-limited period, while using the slow-start threshold ssthresh to save information about the previous value of the congestion window. This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC2861
- Published
- June 2000
- Authors
- M. Handley; J. Padhye; S. Floyd
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 7661
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 2883An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCPCurrent
July 2000
- RFC 2988Computing TCP's Retransmission TimerObsoleted
November 2000
- RFC 3042Enhancing TCP's Loss Recovery Using Limited TransmitCurrent
January 2001
- RFC 3390Increasing TCP's Initial WindowCurrent
November 2002
- RFC 3517A Conservative Selective Acknowledgment (SACK)-based Loss Recovery Algorithm for TCPObsoleted
April 2003
- RFC 3522The Eifel Detection Algorithm for TCPCurrent
April 2003
- RFC 3540Robust Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Signaling with NoncesCurrent
June 2003
- RFC 3649HighSpeed TCP for Large Congestion WindowsCurrent
December 2003
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?